The Effect Of Probing Prompting Learning Approach And Learning Motivation On Students' Science Learning Outcomes In Grade VII SMPN 31 Seluma

Bangkit Jayadi, Sukarno S, Khosi’in K

Abstract


The formulation of the problem in this research is first, there is an influence of the probing prompting learning approach on the science learning outcomes of Class VII Students at SMPN 31 Seluma. Second, there is an influence of learning motivation on the science learning outcomes of class VII students at SMPN 31 Seluma. Third, there is an influence of the probing prompting learning approach and learning motivation on the science learning outcomes of class VII students at SMPN 31 Seluma. The type of research in this research is quantitative research using quasi-experimental or quasi-experimental methods. This design uses control and experimental groups. The results of the first research, there is a probing prompting learning approach to the science learning outcomes of Class VII students at SMPN 31 Seluma. Second, there is an influence of learning motivation on student learning outcomes in science learning outcomes for Class VII students at SMPN 31 Seluma. Third, there is a simultaneous influence of the probing prompting learning approach and learning motivation on the science learning outcomes of class VII at students at SMPN 31 Seluma.

 

Keywords: Probing Prompting Learning Approach, Learning Motivation, Learning Outcomes.


Keywords


Probing Prompting Learning Approach, Learning Motivation , Learning Outcomes.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Research Procedures: A Practice Approach. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Baharuddin, and Esa Nur Wahyuni. 2007. Learning and Learning Theory. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Daryanto. 2012. Education Evaluation. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Dimyati and Mudjiono. 2010. Learning and Learning. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Djaali. 2008. Psychology of Learning. Jakarta: Bumi Literacy.

Hamalik, Oemar. 2012. Teaching and Learning Process. Jakarta: Bumi Literacy.

Hasibuan. 2009. Teaching and Learning Process. Bandung: PT Teen Rosdakarya.

Huda, Miftahul. 2019. Teaching Models. Bandung: Earth of Letters.

Kunandar. 2012. Easy steps for classroom action research: as teacher professional development. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Margono, S. 2000. Educational Research Methods. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Mulyasa, Enco. 2007. Becoming a Professional Teacher, Creating Creative and Fun Learning. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.

Mulyono. 2012. Learning Strategy. Malang: UIN-Maliki Press.

Munawir, Ahmad Warson. 2002. Al-Munawwir Dictionary; Most Complete Arabic-Indonesian, Cet. 25th. Surabaya: Progressive Library.

Ramayulis. 2015. Basics of Islamic Education An Introduction to the Science of Islamic Education. Jakarta: Kalam Mulya.

Riyanto, Orphan. 2020. New Paradigm of Learning. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group

Sadiman, Arif S. 2011. Educational Media. Jakarta: PT Tajagrafindo Persada.

Sani, Ridwan Abdullah. 2014. Learning Innovation. Jakarta: Bumi Literacy.

Sanjaya, Vienna. 2009. Classroom Action Research. Jakarta: Kencana.

Sudjana, Nana. 2010. Assessment of Teaching and Learning Process Results. Bandung: PT Teen Posdakarya.

Sugiyono. 2019. Educational Research Methods Quantitative, Qualitative and R & D Approaches. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suhandoyo. 2013. Efforts to Improve the Quality of Human Resources Through Positive Interaction with the Environment. Yogyakarta: PPM IKIP Yogyakarta.

Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. 2008. Educational Research Methods. Bandung: Rosdakarya Youth.

Trianto. 2001. Elementary School Science Education. Yogyakata: Terrace.

Uno, Hamzah B. 2009. Learning Model. Jakarta: Bumi Literacy.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.55311/jirec.v2i2.272

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Yayasan Al'Adzkiya Rantauprapat

Sekretariat:
Jl. Sisingamangaraja No. 126 Rantauprapat-Sumatera Utara
E-mail: jirecjournal@gmail.com, Website: Asrar Aspia